Nigeria in action against Sudan © Courtesy
Nigeria in action against Sudan © Courtesy

CHAN 24: How Sudan punished Nigeria's defensive frailties in 4-0 upset

Reading Time: 4min | Wed. 13.08.25. | 20:15

For Nigeria, the elimination will be remembered as a product of poor defensive coordination and inefficiency in front of goal. For Sudan, this victory was more than three points—it was a statement of intent that they are tactically prepared to compete for top honours in this tournament

Sudan produced a disciplined and ruthlessly efficient performance to thrash Nigeria 4-0 in their CHAN Group D encounter at the Amani Stadium in Zanzibar.

Follow our WhatsApp channel for more news

The result moved Sudan to the summit of the group with four points from two matches, while condemning Nigeria to a premature group-stage exit.

It was a game that showcased Sudan’s tactical pragmatism, defensive organisation, and sharp execution in attack, particularly through the influential Abdelrazig Omer.


Sudan’s Game Plan: Let Nigeria Have the Ball, Strike at the Right Time

From the outset, Sudan were content to allow Nigeria control of possession, choosing to focus on defensive shape and counter-attacking opportunities.

Nigeria ended the match with 62 percent possession and 11 shots on goal, but only one found the target.

Sudan, in contrast, were devastatingly clinical, registering just three shots on target but converting four goals thanks to defensive errors from their opponents and precise attacking patterns.

Sudan’s approach blended percentage football with measured build-up play. At times, they circulated the ball patiently from the back to progress through midfield. At other moments, they played direct long balls aimed at contesting the second ball. This variation disrupted Nigeria’s defensive rhythm and provided different avenues to launch attacks.


Exploiting Nigeria’s Structural Weaknesses

Nigeria’s 4-4-2 diamond shape, with its narrow midfield, left both fullbacks repeatedly exposed in 1v1 situations.

Sudan recognised this early and consistently attacked down their left flank through Musa Hussein, their main outlet in transition. Hussein frequently drew right-back Ismaila Sodiq away from the defensive line, creating gaps that Sudan exploited with early crosses into the box. This strategy directly contributed to all four goals, which originated from the left wing.

Defensive disorganisation compounded Nigeria’s problems.

Communication breakdowns led to a Leonard Ngenge own goal and a clumsy handball in the penalty area that gifted Sudan their second from the spot. Every time the Nigerian back line was pulled apart, Sudan found a way to capitalise.


Defensive Adaptations and Mid-block Mastery

Sudan’s base system was a 4-3-3, but in defensive phases, they morphed into a 5-3-2 or 5-4-1 midblock. One of the central midfielders regularly dropped into the defensive line to track one of Nigeria’s strikers, creating a 3v2 advantage at the back.

This prevented Nigeria from exploiting their two-forward setup. Depending on the phase of play, one or both wingers dropped deep into midfield to deny Nigeria central overloads, while the fullbacks closely tracked the Nigerian fullbacks to limit any threat from wide areas.

This compact, layered defensive approach frustrated Nigeria’s attempts to progress the ball and forced them into low-percentage shots from distance.


Abdelrazig Omer: The Engine and the Finisher

Central to Sudan’s attacking efficiency was Abdelrazig Omer, who operated as the most advanced midfielder. Omer’s role was tactically intelligent—he alternated between creating overloads in wide areas to link with Hussein and positioning himself centrally to exploit second balls.

His late runs into the penalty area caught Nigeria’s defenders off guard, particularly when the back line was retreating or disorganised after dealing with wide deliveries.

Both of Omer’s goals came from this clever movement and timing. For his first, he arrived unmarked at the far post to finish a low cross.

For his second, he pounced on a loose ball in the box after Nigeria failed to clear their lines. His work rate, positional awareness, and finishing instinct earned him the Man of the Match award for a second consecutive game, underlining his influence in Sudan’s CHAN campaign so far.

Sudan's makeshift back 5 with midfielder dropping to cover 1 of the 2 Nigeria strikers avoiding 1v1 in the backlineSudan's makeshift back 5 with midfielder dropping to cover 1 of the 2 Nigeria strikers avoiding 1v1 in the backline


Sudan’s Tactical Maturity Wins the Day

This was a game defined by tactical clarity and discipline. Sudan identified Nigeria’s structural vulnerabilities early, exploited the flanks with precision, and defended with organisation and adaptability.

Their ability to combine defensive solidity with ruthless counter-attacking ensured a lopsided scoreline despite seeing less of the ball.

For Nigeria, the elimination will be remembered as a product of poor defensive coordination and inefficiency in front of goal. For Sudan, this victory was more than three points—it was a statement of intent that they are tactically prepared to compete for top honours in this tournament.


tags

CHAN 2024NigeriaSudan

Other News